Short version. The full edition of this factory (14 September 2026), with history, geography, practical examples and annotated sources, is available in Russian. Full edition (Russian)
In simple terms
An independent team gets the right to ask uncomfortable questions, check evidence and stop a decision under serious uncertainty. Its conclusion is one of four: acceptable, acceptable with conditions, rework required, or stop required. Criteria and powers are agreed in advance.
Who it helps
Leaders of territories and organisations, investors, project offices, engineers, lawyers, security teams, community representatives and data owners.
Questions you can bring
- What can go wrong and how can we detect it early?
- Which assumptions are unconfirmed?
- Who has the right to stop a dangerous action?
What you receive
- a risk register with causes, consequences and owners
- a map of critical assumptions and missing evidence
- failure and recovery scenarios
- an independent conclusion with mandatory fixes
How quality is checked
The reviewer is separated from the author as far as the risk requires; every remark is tied to evidence and a closing criterion; residual risk is named plainly. AI never alone makes a decision with legal or physical consequences.
Three example requests
Village
“Check the well project: water quality, backup source, maintenance and pump failure.”
City
“Review the city traffic-control system before it is connected to infrastructure.”
Region or country
“Review a large energy programme: suppliers, cyber risks, environment, budget and shutdown plan.”
Sources cited in the full edition
Status: an approved direction of development. These pages describe capabilities; they do not state that a permanent service is already operating or promise funding, partnerships or results.